Built vs. Tririga: Which One is Better for Your Business?

Title 1

Built offers position management and organizational chart software, essential for businesses to efficiently manage talent and ensure organizational resilience. Tririga, on the other hand, provides integrated workplace management solutions, crucial for optimizing real estate and facilities management. We will compare Built and Tririga to determine which platform best meets consumer needs.

A Quick Overview of Built and Tririga

What is Built?

Built provides a modular platform for position management and organizational chart software, catering to businesses across various industries. The platform's unique features include advanced org charts, position management, and succession planning, all designed to integrate seamlessly with existing systems. Customers appreciate its ease of use and the ability to tailor solutions to specific needs.

What is Tririga?

Tririga offers integrated workplace management solutions, focusing on optimizing real estate and facilities management. The platform serves various industries, including corporate real estate, healthcare, and education. Unique features include advanced space planning, lease administration, and energy management, all designed for ease of use and seamless integration with existing systems.

Comparing Built and Tririga: Features and Pricing

Built Features

Built offers a modular platform for position management and organizational chart software, providing several unique features that cater to consumer needs:

Modular Platform: Users can pay for only the modules they need and expand by adding other modules in the future.
Advanced Org Charts: Provides a complete, global view of all positions, including open positions, with powerful visual tools.
Position Management: Allows robust workforce planning and budgeting, tracking vital position information like headcount, budgets, and position history.
Succession Planning: Helps create succession plans for critical positions, leveraging insights and trends to ensure readiness.
Integration Capabilities: Built works seamlessly with existing systems and favorite apps, enhancing overall efficiency.

Tririga Features

Tririga offers a comprehensive suite of features designed to optimize real estate and facilities management:

Advanced Space Planning: Facilitates efficient use of space by providing detailed insights and analytics on space utilization.
Lease Administration: Manages lease agreements and ensures compliance with lease terms, helping to reduce costs and mitigate risks.
Energy Management: Monitors and optimizes energy consumption, contributing to sustainability goals and cost savings.
Maintenance Management: Streamlines maintenance processes, ensuring timely repairs and reducing downtime.
AI-Driven Virtual Assistant: Utilizes IBM watsonx to provide advanced AI support, enhancing user experience and operational efficiency.

Built and Tririga Similarities

Both Built and Tririga offer robust solutions for organizational management, making them valuable tools for businesses looking to optimize their operations. Here are the most important features that are similar between the two platforms:

Position Management: Both platforms allow tracking of headcount, budgets, and position history, enabling effective workforce planning and budgeting.
Org Charts: Each offers advanced, visual tools for creating and managing organizational charts, providing a comprehensive view of the organization.
Succession Planning: Both provide features to identify and develop candidates for critical roles within the organization, ensuring readiness for future leadership needs.
Integration Capabilities: Both platforms emphasize seamless integration with other systems and applications, enhancing overall efficiency and user experience.

Built and Tririga Differences

While both Built and Tririga offer robust solutions for organizational management, their feature sets cater to different needs. Built focuses on position management and organizational charts, whereas Tririga excels in real estate and facilities management.

Modular Platform: Built allows users to choose specific modules like Advanced Org Charts and Succession Planning, offering tailored solutions. Tririga does not offer this modularity.
AI-Driven Virtual Assistant: Tririga utilizes IBM watsonx for advanced AI support, enhancing user experience. Built lacks this feature.
Energy Management: Tririga provides tools for monitoring and optimizing energy consumption, a feature not available in Built.

Built and Tririga Pricing

Built offers a flexible and customizable pricing model, allowing organizations to pay only for the modules they need. This approach includes potential discounts based on company size, non-profit status, and contract length, making it suitable for various organizational sizes. Additionally, Built provides a 14-day free trial and the option to purchase individual modules.

In contrast, specific pricing details for Tririga are not readily available on their webpage. The lack of transparent pricing information makes it challenging to compare directly with Built's detailed and customizable pricing structure.

Based on the available information, Built appears to offer better deals due to its transparent and flexible pricing model.

Why Choose One Over the Other?

Why Choose Built Over Tririga: Consumers might prefer Built over Tririga if they need a modular platform that allows them to pay for only the modules they need today and expand as necessary. This makes Built ideal for HR directors and managers looking for a user-friendly solution to manage org charts, position information, and succession planning efficiently.

Why Choose Tririga Over Built: Consumers might prefer Tririga over Built if they require a comprehensive suite of applications integrated with AI capabilities for managing real estate and facilities. This makes Tririga suitable for enterprise clients and IT managers seeking robust, AI-driven solutions for asset management and operational efficiency.

Considering Banner vs. Built and Tririga

What is Banner?

Banner provides the ideal workflow to make project delivery predictable and efficient. We have thousands of users and are based in the San Francisco Bay Area. Our unique features include real-time spend controls, centralized project data, and a highly configurable tool that eliminates manual data entry.

Comparing Banner to Built and Tririga

Choosing Banner over Built and Tririga offers several distinct advantages:

Real-Time Spend Controls: We provide real-time spend controls, ensuring that project budgets are adhered to without manual oversight.
Centralized Project Data: Our platform centralizes all project data, making it easily accessible and reducing the risk of data silos.
Highly Configurable Tool: Banner is highly configurable, allowing users to tailor the tool to their specific project needs, unlike the more rigid structures of Built and Tririga.
Elimination of Manual Data Entry: We eliminate the need for manual data entry, streamlining workflows and reducing the potential for human error.
Comprehensive Feature Set: Banner offers a comprehensive suite of features, including budgeting, cost tracking, milestones, bidding, approvals, reporting, cashflow forecasting, and a vendor/cost database, all in one platform.

For more information, visit Banner.

What Are the Customers Saying?

Built reviews

Overall, users have given Built a positive rating of 4.6 out of 5 stars. They appreciate its ease of use and helpful customer support, but some have noted issues with navigation and integration.

"Ease of Use" - 5.0 out of 5 - "It's easy and clear to understand and use. I like that it's simple. Sometimes navigation is difficult - to know where to go to run a report." - Katie F.

"Incredible Service Team for a Still-Growing Product" - 4.5 out of 5 - "The best part of Built is their service team. However, the site isn't seamless to navigate." - Zhanna L.

For more information, visit Built Reviews on G2.

Tririga reviews

Overall, users have given Tririga a mixed but generally positive rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars. They appreciate its extensive reporting capabilities and centralization of real estate information but have noted issues with slow performance and a poor user interface.

"A great application for Real State, but there could be improvements." - 3.5 out of 5 - "IBM Tririga is a great application to concentrate various Real State information in one place. The application could be faster, more intuitive, and not open so many tabs during use." - Luiza C.

"Extensive & Effective Tool" - 4.0 out of 5 - "Very well organised tool for abstraction & accounting purposes. User Interface can be improved for better experience." - Rupesh M.

For more information, visit IBM TRIRIGA Application Suite Reviews.

Banner reviews

We have found that users have given Banner an overall rating of 4.8 out of 5 stars. Here are some of the positive reviews highlighting what customers found really useful:

"Efficient Project Management" - 5.0 out of 5 - "Banner has streamlined our project workflows, making it easier to manage budgets and timelines. The real-time spend controls are particularly beneficial." - Dave Ruth, Livcor

"Highly Customizable Tool" - 4.5 out of 5 - "The ability to tailor Banner to our specific project needs has been a game-changer. The centralized project data feature ensures that everyone is on the same page." - Jim Gentili, Industrious

Final Decision: Built, Tririga, or Banner?

While Built and Tririga offer valuable features for organizational and real estate management, Banner stands out with its real-time spend controls, centralized project data, and highly configurable tools. These features make project delivery more predictable and efficient, catering to a wide range of business needs. Any of these platforms could be a good choice, but we recommend Banner for its comprehensive and user-friendly approach to project management.