Built offers position management and organizational chart software, essential for businesses to efficiently manage talent and plan for growth. IBM Maximo provides enterprise asset management solutions, crucial for optimizing asset lifecycles and enhancing operational efficiency through AI-driven insights.
We will compare Built and IBM Maximo to determine which platform best meets consumer needs.
Built is a modular platform designed to help businesses manage their workforce more effectively. It offers tools for creating advanced organizational charts, managing positions, and planning for succession. The platform is designed to be easy to use and scalable, allowing companies to add more modules as their needs grow.
IBM Maximo offers enterprise asset management solutions tailored for industries such as manufacturing, energy, transportation, and healthcare. The platform features asset lifecycle management, predictive maintenance, and IoT data integration. Its user-friendly interface and AI-driven virtual assistant enhance the overall user experience and support.
Built offers a range of features designed to enhance position management and organizational charting for businesses.
IBM Maximo offers a comprehensive suite of features designed to optimize asset management and operational efficiency.
Both Built and IBM Maximo offer robust tools for managing organizational structures and positions, making them valuable for businesses aiming to optimize their workforce and asset management. Here are the most important features that are similar between the two platforms:
While both Built and IBM Maximo offer robust tools for managing organizational structures and positions, their feature sets cater to different needs. Built focuses on workforce planning and organizational charting, whereas IBM Maximo excels in asset management and operational efficiency.
Built offers a customizable pricing model based on the size of the organization, the modules needed, and the length of the contract. Discounts are available for non-profits and longer contract terms, making it flexible and cost-effective for various business sizes.
IBM Maximo's pricing details are not explicitly provided on their webpage, focusing instead on cookie consent and privacy preferences. To get specific pricing information, users would need to contact IBM directly or explore further on their site.
Given the transparency and flexibility in Built's pricing model, it appears to offer better deals, especially for smaller organizations and non-profits.
Why Choose Built Over IBM Maximo: Consumers might prefer Built if they are HR professionals or departments focused on improving talent management, workforce planning, and organizational resilience. Built's modular nature and specific features like advanced org charts and succession planning make it ideal for companies looking to streamline their organizational structure and plan for growth.
Why Choose IBM Maximo Over Built: On the other hand, IBM Maximo is better suited for businesses in industries such as manufacturing, energy, and transportation that require robust asset management capabilities. Its advanced analytics for predictive maintenance and IoT data integration make it a powerful tool for optimizing asset lifecycles and enhancing operational efficiency.
Banner provides the ideal workflow to make project delivery predictable and efficient. We have thousands of users and are based in the San Francisco Bay Area. Our unique features include real-time spend controls, centralized project data, and eliminating manual data entry through advanced technology and integrations.
Choosing Banner over Built and IBM Maximo offers several unique advantages:
For more details, visit Banner.
Overall, users have given Built a rating of 4.6 out of 5 stars. Reviews highlight its ease of use and helpful customer support, but some users have noted issues with PTO tracking and integration.
"Ease of use" - 5.0 out of 5 - Katie F.: "It's easy and clear to understand and use. I like that it's simple. Sometimes navigation is difficult - to know where to go to run a report."
"Incredible Service Team for a Still-Growing Product" - 4.5 out of 5 - Zhanna L.: "The best part of Built for Teams is their service team. The site isn't seamless to navigate. Unfortunately, getting to different screens requires a lot of clicks."
For more details, visit Built Reviews on G2.
IBM Maximo has received an overall rating of 4.4 out of 5 stars. Users appreciate its robust asset management capabilities and real-time data analytics, but some find it complex and challenging to learn.
"Cutting-edge Solution for Asset Management" - 4.5 out of 5 - Farhana Y.: "Mobile workforce enablement is great, but data sync issues arise without internet."
"Robust, Scalable IT" - 4.0 out of 5 - Amgad M.: "Handles growing IT environments well, but has a steep learning curve."
For more details, visit IBM Maximo Reviews on G2.
We have gathered insights from users who have experienced Banner's project management capabilities. According to user reviews, Banner has received an overall rating of 4.7 out of 5 stars.
"Streamlined Project Management" - 5.0 out of 5 - Dave Ruth, Livcor: "Banner has significantly streamlined our project management processes. The real-time spend controls and centralized data have been game-changers for our team."
"Efficient and User-Friendly" - 4.5 out of 5 - Jim Gentili, Industrious: "The ease of use and the elimination of manual data entry have saved us countless hours. Banner's features are comprehensive and intuitive."
While Built and IBM Maximo offer impressive features tailored to specific needs, Banner stands out for its comprehensive project management capabilities and user-friendly interface. Whether you're looking to streamline project delivery or enhance operational efficiency, Banner provides the ideal workflow to make your projects predictable and efficient. We recommend giving Banner a try to experience its unique advantages firsthand.
